Methods · Reliability & validity · Method comparison

Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis

Bland–Altman analysis assesses agreement between two measurement methods by estimating the mean difference (bias) and the 95% limits of agreement within which most differences fall.

Bland-Altman 분석은 두 측정 방법의 차이 평균(편향)과 대부분의 차이가 들어가는 95% 일치 한계를 추정해 두 방법의 일치도를 평가합니다.

Does a new wearable heart-rate monitor agree closely enough with an ECG to replace it?

새 웨어러블 심박계가 심전도를 대체할 수 있을 만큼 측정값이 잘 일치하나요?

Bland–Altman analysis plots the difference between two paired measurements against their mean and summarises agreement with the mean difference and the limits bias ± 1.96 SD of the differences. Confidence intervals for the bias and limits, and a regression of differences on means, show whether disagreement is systematic or grows with magnitude.

When to use Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis

When to use something else

Assumptions and requirements

What the analysis reports

How to report it

The mean difference was [value], 95% CI [[value], [value]], with 95% limits of agreement from [value] to [value] (N = [value]); the regression of differences on means gave a slope of [value], p = [value].

Related methods

Run Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis on Quorant

Data you need
a table (CSV or Excel) with item columns (e.g. questionnaire items)
Price
250 credits for one analysis up to 10,000 rows (complexity level 2); larger or wider data costs more. Optional methodologist review: 1200 credits.
Checking
Checked by property tests in every deployment
Before you pay
A free pre-analysis diagnosis checks your data and gives an exact quote; nothing is deducted until you approve it.

Method ID Q41009 · Reviewed 2026-10-25