Equivalence Test (TOST)
The two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure tests whether a difference between two group means lies within prespecified equivalence bounds by rejecting both one-sided nulls at the bounds.
TOST 동등성 검정은 두 집단 평균 차이가 미리 정한 동등성 구간 안에 있는지를 하한과 상한에 대한 두 개의 단측 검정으로 판정하는 방법이다.
My t test was not significant; can I conclude that the two groups are the same?
t 검정에서 차이가 유의하지 않으면 두 집단이 같다고 말해도 되나요?
No, a non-significant difference is not evidence of equivalence. TOST tests the difference against a lower and an upper equivalence bound with two one-sided t tests, and equivalence is concluded only when both are rejected, which is the same as the 90% confidence interval lying inside the bounds.
When to use Equivalence Test (TOST)
- You want to show that two treatments or groups are practically equivalent.
- A smallest effect size of interest can be justified in advance.
- You want to complement a non-significant difference test.
When to use something else
- You want to show one treatment is not worse by more than a margin; use a non-inferiority test instead.
- The bounds cannot be justified; report the confidence interval of the difference instead.
Assumptions and requirements
- Observations are independent.
- Each group is approximately normal or large enough for the t approximation.
- Equivalence bounds are set before seeing the data; if none are given, ±0.5 pooled SD is used.
What the analysis reports
- Mean difference with 90% confidence interval
- Lower and upper one-sided t statistics and p-values
- Overall TOST p-value
- Welch degrees of freedom
How to report it
A Welch TOST procedure with equivalence bounds of [low] and [high] showed that the difference ([value], 90% CI [[value], [value]]) was [within/not within] the bounds, t([df]) = [value] and [value], p = [value].
Related methods
Run Equivalence Test (TOST) on Quorant
- Data you need
- a table (CSV or Excel) with an outcome variable and a grouping variable
- Price
- 250 credits for one analysis up to 10,000 rows (complexity level 2); larger or wider data costs more. Optional methodologist review: 1200 credits.
- Checking
- Checked by property tests in every deployment
- Before you pay
- A free pre-analysis diagnosis checks your data and gives an exact quote; nothing is deducted until you approve it.