Panel Unit Root Test
Panel unit root tests, such as the Levin-Lin-Chu, Im-Pesaran-Shin, and Fisher-type tests, check whether a variable observed across many units over time is nonstationary by pooling information across the panel.
패널 단위근 검정은 Levin-Lin-Chu, Im-Pesaran-Shin, Fisher형 검정처럼 여러 개체의 시계열 정보를 결합하여 패널 변수가 비정상인지를 검정하는 방법입니다.
How do I test whether variables in my panel data are stationary before running a panel time-series model?
패널 시계열 모형을 돌리기 전에 패널 변수들이 정상성을 갖는지 어떻게 검정하나요?
Panel unit root tests assess whether a variable measured for many units over time contains a unit root, gaining power over single-series tests by combining information across units. They are a standard first step before panel cointegration or dynamic panel models, and second-generation tests are needed when units are cross-sectionally dependent.
When to use Panel Unit Root Test
- Country, region, or firm panels with a moderately long time dimension
- Checking stationarity before panel cointegration or panel VAR models
- Deciding whether to model variables in levels or first differences
When to use something else
- A single time series: use the augmented Dickey-Fuller test
- Strong cross-sectional dependence among units: use a second-generation test such as Pesaran's CIPS
Assumptions and requirements
- Time dimension long enough for time-series inference
- Cross-sectional independence for first-generation tests
- Lag length and deterministic terms (constant, trend) chosen appropriately
- Balanced panel required by some tests
What the analysis reports
- Test statistic and p-value for each test
- Null and alternative hypotheses of each test
- Selected lag lengths
- Results in levels and in first differences
How to report it
The Im-Pesaran-Shin test rejected the null hypothesis that all panels contain a unit root for [variable] in first differences, W-t-bar = [value], p = [value].
Related methods
- Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test
- Panel Cointegration Test
- Panel VAR
Run Panel Unit Root Test on Quorant
- Data you need
- a table (CSV or Excel) with a unit (entity) ID, a time variable and an outcome variable
- Price
- 400 credits for one analysis up to 10,000 rows (complexity level 3); larger or wider data costs more. Optional methodologist review: 1800 credits.
- Checking
- Python results are cross-checked against R reference outputs in every deployment
- Before you pay
- A free pre-analysis diagnosis checks your data and gives an exact quote; nothing is deducted until you approve it.