Methods · Effect size · Robust statistics

Robust Effect Sizes for Group Differences

Robust effect sizes for group differences summarise how far two groups differ using trimmed and winsorized statistics and rank-based dominance measures that resist outliers and heavy tails.

강건 효과크기는 절사평균·윈저화 분산과 순위 기반 우월 확률을 이용해 이상값과 두꺼운 꼬리에 흔들리지 않게 두 집단의 차이 크기를 나타내는 지표입니다.

My two groups have skewed scores with outliers; which effect size should I report instead of Cohen's d?

두 집단 점수가 치우쳐 있고 이상값이 있는데, Cohen's d 대신 어떤 효과크기를 보고해야 하나요?

Robust effect sizes replace means and standard deviations with trimmed means, winsorized variances or pairwise dominance so that a few extreme values cannot drive the result. Reporting the Algina–Keselman–Penfield d together with Cliff's delta and the probability of superiority, each with a bootstrap interval, gives a magnitude that stays meaningful when normality fails.

When to use Robust Effect Sizes for Group Differences

When to use something else

Assumptions and requirements

What the analysis reports

How to report it

The robust standardized difference was d = [value], 95% bootstrap CI [[value], [value]] (20% trimming); Cliff's delta = [value], 95% CI [[value], [value]], probability of superiority A = [value].

Related methods

Run Robust Effect Sizes for Group Differences on Quorant

Data you need
a table (CSV or Excel) with an outcome variable and a grouping variable
Price
250 credits for one analysis up to 10,000 rows (complexity level 2); larger or wider data costs more. Optional methodologist review: 1200 credits.
Checking
Checked by property tests in every deployment
Before you pay
A free pre-analysis diagnosis checks your data and gives an exact quote; nothing is deducted until you approve it.

Method ID Q17001 · Reviewed 2026-10-25