Robust Effect Sizes for Group Differences
Robust effect sizes for group differences summarise how far two groups differ using trimmed and winsorized statistics and rank-based dominance measures that resist outliers and heavy tails.
강건 효과크기는 절사평균·윈저화 분산과 순위 기반 우월 확률을 이용해 이상값과 두꺼운 꼬리에 흔들리지 않게 두 집단의 차이 크기를 나타내는 지표입니다.
My two groups have skewed scores with outliers; which effect size should I report instead of Cohen's d?
두 집단 점수가 치우쳐 있고 이상값이 있는데, Cohen's d 대신 어떤 효과크기를 보고해야 하나요?
Robust effect sizes replace means and standard deviations with trimmed means, winsorized variances or pairwise dominance so that a few extreme values cannot drive the result. Reporting the Algina–Keselman–Penfield d together with Cliff's delta and the probability of superiority, each with a bootstrap interval, gives a magnitude that stays meaningful when normality fails.
When to use Robust Effect Sizes for Group Differences
- Two independent groups are compared on a continuous or ordinal outcome with outliers or heavy tails.
- A Yuen trimmed-means test or a Mann–Whitney test is reported and needs a matching effect size.
- Reviewers ask for an effect size with a confidence interval that does not assume normality.
When to use something else
- The same people are measured twice; use a paired effect size such as the paired-samples d or a matched-pairs rank-biserial correlation.
- More than two groups are compared at once; use an omnibus effect size such as robust explanatory power from a trimmed-means ANOVA.
Assumptions and requirements
- Observations are independent within and between the two groups.
- The outcome is at least ordinal; AKP d and xi additionally need an interval scale.
- Percentile bootstrap intervals need moderate group sizes (about 10 or more per group).
What the analysis reports
- AKP robust d (trimmed means over pooled winsorized SD, rescaled to the Cohen d metric) with bootstrap CI
- Wilcox–Tian explanatory measure xi with bootstrap CI
- Cliff's delta with bootstrap CI
- Probability of superiority A (Vargha–Delaney) with bootstrap CI
- Trimmed means of both groups
How to report it
The robust standardized difference was d = [value], 95% bootstrap CI [[value], [value]] (20% trimming); Cliff's delta = [value], 95% CI [[value], [value]], probability of superiority A = [value].
Related methods
Run Robust Effect Sizes for Group Differences on Quorant
- Data you need
- a table (CSV or Excel) with an outcome variable and a grouping variable
- Price
- 250 credits for one analysis up to 10,000 rows (complexity level 2); larger or wider data costs more. Optional methodologist review: 1200 credits.
- Checking
- Checked by property tests in every deployment
- Before you pay
- A free pre-analysis diagnosis checks your data and gives an exact quote; nothing is deducted until you approve it.