Zero Inflated Negative Binomial Regression
Zero-inflated negative binomial regression models a count outcome as a mixture of structural zeros, predicted by a logistic part, and a negative binomial count process that allows overdispersion.
영과잉 음이항회귀는 구조적 0 집단(로지스틱)과 과산포를 허용하는 음이항 횟수 과정을 섞어 0이 많고 분산이 큰 횟수 자료를 설명하는 모형입니다.
My counts have many zeros and the non-zero counts also vary much more than the mean; which model handles both?
0도 많고 0이 아닌 값의 분산도 평균보다 훨씬 큰 횟수 자료에는 어떤 모형이 맞나요?
Zero-inflated negative binomial regression combines a logistic model for an always-zero group with a negative binomial model whose variance μ + αμ² exceeds the mean. It is preferred over the zero-inflated Poisson model when the dispersion parameter α is clearly above zero.
When to use Zero Inflated Negative Binomial Regression
- Counts show both excess zeros and overdispersion
- A structural-zero group is plausible, such as people who never perform the behaviour
- A zero-inflated Poisson model leaves a Pearson dispersion well above 1
When to use something else
- There is overdispersion but no excess zeros; use negative binomial regression instead
- The variance of the non-zero counts equals the mean; use zero-inflated Poisson regression instead
Assumptions and requirements
- Counts in the at-risk group follow a negative binomial (NB2) distribution
- Membership in the always-zero group follows a logistic model
- Observations are independent
- Both parts are correctly specified
What the analysis reports
- Count-part coefficients with incidence rate ratios
- Inflation-part coefficients with odds ratios
- Dispersion parameter α
- AIC compared with a plain negative binomial model
- Vuong test statistic and p value
How to report it
A zero-inflated negative binomial model (α = [value]) was preferred to a standard negative binomial model (AIC = [value] vs [value]; Vuong z = [value], p = [value]); [predictor] was associated with higher counts, IRR = [value], 95% CI [[value], [value]].
Related methods
Run Zero Inflated Negative Binomial Regression on Quorant
- Data you need
- a table (CSV or Excel) with an outcome variable and predictor (feature) columns
- Price
- 600 credits for one analysis up to 10,000 rows (complexity level 4); larger or wider data costs more. Optional methodologist review: 2400 credits.
- Checking
- Checked by property tests in every deployment
- Before you pay
- A free pre-analysis diagnosis checks your data and gives an exact quote; nothing is deducted until you approve it.